National Early Warning Score vs Rapid Response Team criteria-Prevalence, misclassification, and outcome

Friman O, Bell M, Djärv T, Hvarfner A, Jäderling G. National Early Warning Score vs Rapid Response Team criteria-Prevalence, misclassification, and outcome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(2):215–221.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of deviating vital parameters in general ward patients using rapid response team (RRT) criteria and National Early Warning Score (NEWS), assess exam duration, correct calculation and classification of risk score as well as mortality and adverse events. METHODS: Point prevalence study of vital parameters according to NEWS and RRT criteria of all adult patients admitted to general wards at a Scandinavian university hospital with a mature RRT. PRIMARY OUTCOME: prevalence of at-risk patients fulfilling at least one RRT criteria, total NEWS of 7 or greater or a single NEWS parameter of 3 (red NEWS). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mortality in-hospital and within 30 days or adverse events within 24 hours.
Last updated on 02/26/2023